Mike Postle Drops Defamation Lawsuit and Now Faces Anti-Slapp Cases

By Scott Bowen,
Editor at online-gambling.com

Scott Bowen Editor at online-gambling.com

Scott Bowen is a casino expert and editor with many years of experience in the gambling industry. He is one of the most valuable members of our team at online-gambling.com. Bowen specializes in writing on a variety of subjects, including roulette, blackjack, video poker, sports betting, and more.

• Twitter
• Email

More About Scott Bowen

Last updated: April 21, 2021

After the well-known poker player Mike Postle filed a major 330 million dollars defamation lawsuit on various prestigious educational websites, investigative staff, poker players, and even the media, he dropped the lawsuit.

He also opened another box of legitimate worms, as he has two cases pending against him for which sentences are unknown.

A Simple Move Stops Postle’s Litigation

Last week, Postle filed a tacit petition with the Sacramento County Superior Court, saying he would not anymore pursue the judicial proceedings. In 330 M dollars legal proceedings, Postle blamed the sports channel ESPN, various poker press websites, and other prominent members of the poker groups for infecting his reputation.

The lawsuit, filed in Oct 2020, said it was the subject of libel, “commercial defamation” (damage to his professional reputation), and “willful infliction of mental anguish.”

The wheels of the trial fell off almost from the very beginning. In December, the legislative group that brought Postle together to review the case dismissed him as a client and propose a petition to exclude him from the case.

This petition was upheld in January, and Postle worked as a lawyer for over two months, filing petitions for the prosecution claim he was seeking alternative representation.

Postle Will Be Held Liable for the Legal Costs

If Postle believes abandoning the case will finish the story, he will suddenly wake up. Two of those accused in his libel trial, Veronica Brill and Todd Witteles, did not agree to have their names revealed in Postle’s suit.

Once Postle registered his case, Veronica and Todd presented a case called anti-SLAPP. SLAPP stands for Strategic Public Participation Action or a proper way used to dissuade somebody from talking openly through unnecessary and costly litigation.

The anti-SLAPP litigation seeks to defame those who use the justice method as a way of appeasing somebody who was an analyst or informant. By using this judicial system, people who confirm they are the target of SLAPP litigation can file a claim for the person who lawsuit them to give legal costs.

After studying the law, Postle dropped his suit from the list; he now missed the lawsuits anti-SLAPP brought by Brill and Witteles and will be held liable for the legal costs he incurred to appear in court to defend the case.

Does Postle Have Anything Else?

The issue with this suit is whether he has something to pay his opponents’ royalties. Postle reportedly made over 300k dollars in 2019 from Stones Live, a low-risk streaming show developed by Stones Gambling Hall in California. It was that show wherein Postle played some awesome games and put on some awesome shootouts for large victories.

Brill and several others who have dealt with libel cases challenging Postle’s way of creating these games, many have found that he somehow got real-time information about his competitor hole cards during his actions.

Allegations of Postle’s involvement with a Stones Gambling Hall worker led to an initial trial that was legally dismissed by a court under California gambling loss laws. The Stones Gambling Hall would later make a deal with some of those who sued without a plea, but Brill did not come to an agreement. She can now take her paycheck out of Postle’s pocket through the anti-SLAPP lawsuit.